🎳 Nikon 300Mm F4 Vs F2 8

I don' t have the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 AFS II (can't afford it) and just got the Sigma 120-300mm with the 2x TC. Maybe I should consider the 1.4 x. I'm doing bird photography and am well aware of the limitation of a 300mm lens as far as reach is concerned that's why I got the TC. My scant experience is only with the Nikon 300mm f/4 plus TC 1.4E Leopard Frog – Panasonic G9 + Laowa 2X Macro @ 50mm, ISO 2000, 1/160, f/2.8. That’s why I think most wildlife photographers should also have a macro lens in their bag. The most common macro lenses are usually about 100mm equivalent in focal length, like these: Nikon Z (mirrorless): Nikon 105mm f/2.8 VR S. 300mm f/2.8 + TC1.4EII at f/4 is definitely not as sharp as the 300mm f/2.8 at f/2.8 and is marginally not sharp enough. The 300mm f2.8 when @ f2.8 (wide open) will be sharper than the 300mm f2.8 + 1.4x TCII is attached and shot at f4 (also wide open). This stands to reason as the 1.4x TCII does degrade the image slightly. Nikon 120-300mm f/2.8. If you like the idea of a 300mm f/2.8G II but in a zoom, this is your lens. Interestingly, it is 3.25kg, which is not much heavier than the 2.9kg of the 300mm f/2.8. I would suggest that for most people, this lens is a little bit short for wildlife, especially at $9500. This is a very specialized tool. Focal length: 300mm. Aperture: f/4 – f/32. Minimum focus distance: 1.4m. Filter size: 77mm. Aperture blades: 9. Construction: 16 Elements in 10 groups. Size (Diameter / Length): 89mm x 147.5mm. Weight: 755g. It’s also a ‘FX’ lens, so it will work with all full frame and cropped sensor Nikon DSLRs. If your talking about the Nikon afs 300mm f2.8 ed if II lens, then yes the tc 1.4EII will work fine. I have the Nikon afs 300mm f2.8d ed if lens which is heavier than the II lens and it works fine with the tc 1.4EII. If you get a chance to buy the Nikon afs 300mm f2.8 ed II, jump at it. Its the lightest of all the 300 f2.8 lenses. Larry Why is Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm F/2.8G ED VR II better than Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm F4E PF ED VR? 30% wider aperture at minimum focal length? f/2.8 vs f/4.0 Edgar - I've been playing around with the 2.8 a little and I own the 4.0. In my opinion, the 2.8 focuses much faster and produces better bokeh (blurred background). The 2.8 also does better with TCs for AF. If you are shooting static subjects, the 300 4.0 is a great lens. It produces very nice, sharp images. Nikon 300mm f/2.8 + TC-17E II vs Nikon 200-400mm f/4.0 + TC-14E II. Now here is an interesting comparison – if we take the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 and add the TC-17E II, we end up at 510mm. If we take the 200-400mm and add the TC-14E II, we get to 560mm. This time, I tried to match the field of view, because 50mm was too big of a difference. .

nikon 300mm f4 vs f2 8